Palm used a pretotype to test the assumptions of its Pilot before deploying a team of engineers to the project. A pretotype lives somewhere between an amorphous idea and a sophisticated prototype and can avoid slow and costly failure. By contrast, a traditional prototype can be a complex engineering feat onto itself, consuming valuable time and resources to create. However, customers soon determined they didn’t really want it because it wasn’t engineered with them in mind from the beginning.īuild a Pretotype: Savoia also outlines ways companies can avoid failure through product pretotyping - a process that allows engineers to ensure they are building the right product before they begin. In reality, a lot of things were done right - the product did what it was designed to do and the development teams did a great job building a solid and reliable product. In this scenario, the initial concept is flawed and the wrong product is built from the start. Here’s what engineers can do to ease the development process and deliver the right products:Īvoid Failure of Premise: When I meet with customers in the design phase of their products, I often cite the insights of an early Google Engineering Director, Alberto Savoia, who describes “failure of premise” as one of the key reasons products fail.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |